[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship



On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:43:18PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Jérôme Marant 
> 
> | On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:21:11PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> |
> | > Then I suggest you scratch your itch without forcing everybody else to
> | > have the same itch as you.
> | 
> |   I want something that you don't need. Then, I win.
> | 
> |   'Tell me what you need and I'll tell you how not to need it'
> |   That's what you are proposing.
> 
> No, it's not.  I am saying that I don't think this is a problem.  You
> are proposing to change how I do my stuff, not the other way around.
> 
> | > |   I have a recent case of someone who NMU'ed packages of someone
> | > |   I do sponsor but I wasn't aware of that.
> | > 
> | > Then you hadn't subscribed to the package through the PTS, I think.
> | 
> |   Of course I did, but NMU requests have never been implied
> |   access to the BTS. I want an entry point for contacts with the
> |   sponsoree. I don't have any currently.
> 
> Parse error for the first part.
> 
> Uhm, you don't have an entry point?  Like -mentors?
> 
> |   It is a matter of practice. The one Raphaël is proposing would not
> |   be annoying at all.
> 
> For me it would, because of the amount of noise.  The BTS is quite
> noisy.

And -mentors is not ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: