[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSB 3.0 and who's doing what?

Jeff Licquia writes...

> On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:25 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> > I think this work around would only be needed for stable, unstable should b
> e 
> > able to do 3.0 on it's own (and probably 2.0 at the same time). 
> I should point out that this was the conventional wisdom for woody vs.
> sarge at one point.  Now we are saying the same thing for sarge vs.
> etch.  Will we be saying the same thing for etch vs. etch+1?  What will
> prevent this from happening?

etch releasing in 12 months. Call me crazy but I think it's possible given the 
improvements in release infrastructure. (although there are still issues being 

Matt Taggart

Reply to: