[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSB 3.0 and who's doing what?

Matt Taggart wrote:
>>Also is Debian interested in skipping LSB 2.0 compliance and moving 
>>straight to LSB 3.0?
> I don't think so because sarge can't be 3.0 compliant (glibc isn't new enough 
> among other things) so I think 2.0 for sarge and 3.0+ for etch.

Have you seen this?


In other words, we're working on a way to make sarge LSB 3.0 compliant
without having to introduce an updated libc (and break compatibility).

Ian Murdock
317-578-8882 (office)

"A nerd is someone who uses a telephone to talk to other people about
telephones." --Douglas Adams

Reply to: