On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:10:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:52:24AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > Debatable, but I think that seems a bit arrogant. > It's not arrogance, it's that anyone who doesn't already know that Pluggable > Authentication Modules == PAM also doesn't /need/ to know that in order to > understand the debconf question. Actually, for this reason I'm inclined to I'd also expect that most users who do know what's going on will understand the term PAM without knowing what it expands to. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Description: Digital signature