Re: Importing all DDTP PO files in Pootle....
Christian,
Yes, the commit problem is now resolved.
Thanks.
Nicholas Ng
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> Quoting Nicholas Ng (nbliang@gmail.com):
>> Christian,
>>
>> > The Malay translator, for instance, should be committing files for D-I
>> > through Pootle.
>>
>> I still have problem committing the changes through Pootle where when
>> I tried it, I was given the following error:
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Error
>> [SVN] Error running SVN command '['svn', '-q', '--non-interactive',
>> 'commit', '-m', u'Commit from Debian/Pootle l10n server by user
>> nbliang. 329 of 545 messages translated (67 fuzzy).',
>> u'/var/lib/pootle/di/level1/sublevel1/ms.po']': svn: Commit failed
>> (details follow): svn: Aborting commit:
>> '/var/lib/pootle/di/level1/sublevel1/ms.po' remains in conflict
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Can I commit the un-finish (not 100% translated) work? Or do I miss
>> out something?
>
>
> Hmmm, there's apparently an SVN conflict for ms.po
>
> That can happen if the file is changed in the SVN while you have, in
> Pootle, a file with changes you made and which you didn't commit.
>
> I sorted this out on Pootle. This came because I merged into the SVN
> the translations from Rosetta, then committed them to D-I SVN while,
> in the same time you were doing work in Pootle.
>
> When the time came, on the pootle server to update the SVN copy, the
> conflict arose.
>
> As I said, this is now sorted out. You should now be able to commit
> from Pootle. Please do it ASAP.
>
> Indeed, I strongly recommend people to avoid letting uncommited
> changes in Pootle as of now. These conflicts problems might indeed
> lead me to reconsider the way the D-I level 1 data are handled in
> Pootle. The probability for conflicts seems fairly high indeed.
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkh+6/IACgkQ1OXtrMAUPS3P1wCfZw+VWyOZ1vxr+z40nEWbl8ZO
> dfgAnRGVD2jhADqS4ZAHOJtCfqItF2QM
> =vjxW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Reply to: