[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Recommendations (was: Re: Package name?)




On 18/06/2008, at 1:55 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:

Quoting Gerfried Fuchs (rhonda@deb.at):

Something that I already mentioned to maintainers each time they were
breaking templates for these packages (which happened a *lot*)...

Well, if it happens a *lot* it would be sufficient for me to justify a debian-devel-announce mail about it. Do you want to write one yourself, have a suggestion for a text for it, or leave this decision to someone
else completely? I am lacking the background about the *lot*
unfortunately, but I trust you that your emphasis is justified.

My initial statement was apparently confusing: maintainers do not
change their debconf tempaltes a *lot*.....they indeed do it fairly
rarely and I think that having some ppl whining constantly about this
had this effect for lenny: last minute templates changes are very
seldom now.

What happens a *lot* are changes to the mysql-dfsg-* packages.....at
least from my own and maybe biased, point of view.

It is hard (and not comfortable) to "point fingers" and I have too
much respect for the debian package maintainers to do this angrily.

So, well, as this is restricted to these packages, I don't think that
an announcement would be appropriate.

I think it's worth mentioning the issue to the maintainers of this package, though. It was worth while mentioning the duplication of messages in some packages: we now have zope-common and other -common files.

A little tactful prodding in the right place can save time later on. ;)

(Don't ask me how you prod someone tactfully. I think you start with "Excuse me, I'm about to prod you...")

from Clytie

Vietnamese Free Software Translation Team
http://vnoss.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=projects:l10n



Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: