Re: GNOME 2 in unstable announcement
Le Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:48:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera écrivait:
> They're usually happy after we've solved the problems, yes, but it's
> certainly not perfect.
I never said that G2D was perfect. But it is good enough for unstable.
> 1) Jeff is an upstream
I know that.
> > There's no way we're going to complicate our life with twice the
> > packages in unstable (asking for a lot of work from the ftpmasters
> > BTW).
>
> And using testing-proposed-updates doesn't complicate our lifes, as well
> as the ftp-master's ?
What gives work to ftpmasters is adding new packages to the distribution
(you know *2 for example...) and removing them a few week later. Uploading
existing packages to t-p-u gives no work to ftpmasters.
(Actually someone has to move packages from t-p-u to testing, but the
plan is to make it automatic as soon as we know how to handle that
properly)
> > They won't go nuts.
>
> Maybe. I'm certainly not ready to actually test that in the current
> situation.
Unfortunately, you're not the only one involved in that decision.
It's mainly Christian's decision ... when people will have "file-roller"
for G1.4 installed and that G2D is otherwise installed, we'll have *real*
problems ...
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
Reply to: