[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME-2 transition: necessary?



On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 21:17, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> "JW" == Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Both of those are things that need to be addressed as soon as possible.
> > Replacing G1D components with G2D components piecemeal is foolish, and I
> > have no idea why Christian is taking this approach.
> 
> Because gnome-terminal 2 is better than the 1.4 version and I can't
> maintains two sawfish versions.
> 
> If I want to package two sawfishs, then I need to maintains two
> rep-gtk versions (0.15 and 0.16), who conflicts each other because
> sawfish always find the 0.15 version and the build for sawfish 2 will
> fail. Then for building sawfish for gtk 1.2 I need to remove sawfish 2.0
> and rep-gtk 0.15 package and vice versa, not really realistic.

If it is so, the better option would have been to upload sawfish with a
different package name, and orphan the old sawfish.

Cheers

-- 
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: