Re: [rant] Re: Consequences of moving Emacs Manuals to non-free
David Kastrup <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Since the principal goal for the Debian project is providing free
> software and they can't consider GNU software free in documented form,
> they probably should abandon the whole GNU/Linux project and instead
> try packaging something like BSD/Linux, a Linux kernel with BSD
> utilities all around.
> But the current course is pure duplicity.
Duplicity is trying to make people believe that licensing documents
under the GFDL makes documentation free.
Why would restricted modifications of software be suddenly acceptable,
while they would not with GPL?