Re: [rant] Re: Consequences of moving Emacs Manuals to non-free
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:45:50 -0600, Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> said:
> On 23 Mar 2006, Sven Joachim uttered the following:
>> Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> I just downloaded make 3.80 from ftp.gnu.org, and you appear to be
>>> wrong about that. Here is an excerpt from make.texi: Permission is
>>> granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the
>>> terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any
>>> later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
>>> Invariant Sections being ``GNU General Public License'', the
>>> Front-Cover Texts being ``A GNU Manual'', and with the Back-Cover
>>> Texts being as in (a) below. A copy of the license is included in
>>> the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
>>> Front-cover and back-cover texts are invariant.
>> This does not match what I saw in /usr/share/info/make.info.gz from
>> the Debian package, version 3.80+3.81.rc1-1:
> The info file is a derived file; the source is make.texi. The
> preferred form for modification is the texi file, which is non free.
The inconsistency smells a lot like an oversight. Have you checked with
upstream to see if that was what was actually intended, or if it was a
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA