[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming of network devices - how to improve it in buster



 ❦ 13 juillet 2017 13:55 -0700, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> :

>>> The workaround was a bunch of bullshit in our install process to try to
>>> figure out which NIC got the DHCP response and then pin that one to
>>> eth0 for subsequent boots.  (Which is basically what udev persistent
>>> naming did.)
>
>> At least when you netboot there's a protocol supported by PXELINUX to
>> pass a BOOTIF= option to the kernel with the MAC address of the NIC that
>> performed the PXE boot. And d-i is supposed to then DHCP on that
>> particular interface. But if that all is properly persisted onto the
>> final system without intervention, that I don't know[1].
>
> Yeah, we were using FAI, but I believe that's the basic mechanism we were
> using and then found a way to use it to generate the udev rule to do
> persistent naming.

This is a perfect use case for the new udev. It would have provided you
with reproducible names on your fleet of hosts without any tweaking.
-- 
Parenthesise to avoid ambiguity.
            - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: