[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jquery debate with upstream

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>> As far as I can tell, not modifying the DSFG at the same time was an
>> oversight. Fixing that mistake was attempted in a later GR but that was
>> blocked with a narrow margin.
>> https://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_004
> That GR proposal does not require source for non-programmatic works.  It
> only "strongly recommends" it, and says explicitly that such source
> doesn't have to be in the archive.

Interesting, I must have glossed over that as I was on VAC at the time.

I note that the ftpmasters currently reject packages that are missing
source for non-programmatic works (REJECT-FAQ explicitly mentions
PS/PDF documentation). So the current archive requirements are in
practice stricter than the DFSG and the attempted DFSG clarification




Reply to: