Re: How to handle Debian patches
On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:29:13 +0200, Mike Hommey <email@example.com> said:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:58:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:42:54 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> Hmm. You say things like this:
>> > Because the git format is imho conceptualy broken and the
>> > implementation is far from completely thought out.
>> And then you go saying things like that:
>> > It is trivial to generate a quilt format package from
>> > git/arch/hg/svn and I'm sure there will be a RCS-build-package soon
>> > enough that does that.
>> This can not happen without manual intervention, if the topic
>> branches have overlap. And Redoing the manual conflict resolution
>> over and over and over again is a burden (the manual conflict
>> resolution lives generally in the integration branch history, and can
>> be done once, and mostly ignored from that point on).
> git has git rerere to deal with this.
A) This is great for git users. Is there a hg-rerere? svn-rerere?
tla-rerere? bzr-rerere? I am just as opposed to everyone must use
git as I am to everyone must use quilt.
B) (This is an honest question). How many things can rerere remember? If
I use rerere to record how to resolve current conflicts in feature
branches, does the historical information get lost? (like, I use
rerere to help merging the current upstream version, do we lose
information about previous upstream versions?)
Many people feel that they deserve some kind of recognition for all the
bad things they haven't done.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C