On 17/05/08 at 23:00 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 08:49:39PM +0000, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:40:53PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > All in all, pointing to VCSes is just making things harder, because > > > you fight against direct product of VCSes, workflows, and almost > > > packages. And no tool is really gonna sort that out. OTOH, if we _do_ > > > mandate people to one way or another serialize their patches in the > > > source format, with comments and all that stuff, then it _IS_ a good > > > thing, because that's the kind of things that can be grokked by tools > > > trivially. And for that, the v3 format goes in the proper direction. > > > > s/the v3 format/the v3 quilt format/ > > Err yes. I indeed think the other v3 formats are somehow insane. At some point, we will need to find a way to decide which v3 format we are going to choose in adddition to the v3 (native) format (with a GR?). We can't afford to allow several different v3 formats to coexist. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature