also sprach martin f krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006.06.01.2122 +0200]: > > Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done > > Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done > > Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded > > Starting RAID device md3 ... 1/3 drives, failed > > Starting RAID device md4 ... 3 drives, done > > What do people think about that? > > The only problem is that I start them all at once, then parse the > output. So the above is not really true. "not true" means that I am not "starting" md1 after md0 has started successfully. Right now, the script does this: Stopping RAID devices... md6 busy; md5 busy; md3 busy; md2 busy; md0 busy; md1 busy; failed (6 busy, 1 stopped). Starting RAID devices... md0 running; md1 running; md2 running; md3 running; md4 started (3/3); md5 running; md6 running; done (6 running, 1 started, 0 failed). Which do people prefer? Btw: I cannot yet log which ones have been stopped, there's no easy way to find out with only POSIX and without /usr/bin/*. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system what do you mean, it's not packaged in debian?
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)