Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
On Mar 26, Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
> You made many arguments, but that doesn't mean they answered the two
> specific questions: what freedoms, exactly, and why reduced ones for
> this particular class of software?
Since I answered both questions I think it's obvious that we cannot
communicate, so I will drop this.
(BTW, please get a clue and stop Cc'ing me in every reply in spite of
the debian lists policy and my Mail-Followup-To headers.)
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Raphael Hertzog <raphael@ouaza.com>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>