Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:59:49PM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com>
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:37:02PM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> >> Do you have any arguments for this that do *not* basically reason
> >> backwards from "we want this stuff to be in main, freedoms or not"?
> > Well, I would start with "we want this stuff in main" and work from
> > there;
> See? There you go.
I have a hard time believing that this is a fundamentally wrong approach to
- David Nusinow