Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Scripsit Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Please don't rehash old arguments. Nobody has argued that we should put
> non-free packages into main, but we don't agree on what is free and what
> isn't for all types of packages.
Do you have any arguments for this that do *not* basically reason
backwards from "we want this stuff to be in main, freedoms or not"?
Henning Makholm "Occam was a medieval old fart. The simplest
explanation that fits the facts is always, God did it."