[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Description of tasks

On ven, 2004-07-16 at 21:50 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Oh, and to prevent other speculations:
> An uncooperating buildd admin can get a pain in the arse of many
> developers. The qt-x11-free horror in January is an example of this.
> I think that it will not help maintainers when they see a contact infos
> listed on buildd.net, but the buildd admin behind that address is ignorant
> and not cooperative at all. In that case the info on buildd.net is not
> worth being listed, because it doesn't help.
> Or to put it the other way around: the info on buildd.net can help
> maintainers when the buildd admin is cooperating.

True. My experience of the @buildd.d.o addresses is that the HP people
(responsible for ia64 and hppa) are very responsive, re-queuing stuff
when needed, but other requests seem to be dropped to /dev/null.
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: