On ven, 2004-07-16 at 21:50 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Oh, and to prevent other speculations: > An uncooperating buildd admin can get a pain in the arse of many > developers. The qt-x11-free horror in January is an example of this. > I think that it will not help maintainers when they see a contact infos > listed on buildd.net, but the buildd admin behind that address is ignorant > and not cooperative at all. In that case the info on buildd.net is not > worth being listed, because it doesn't help. > Or to put it the other way around: the info on buildd.net can help > maintainers when the buildd admin is cooperating. True. My experience of the @buildd.d.o addresses is that the HP people (responsible for ia64 and hppa) are very responsive, re-queuing stuff when needed, but other requests seem to be dropped to /dev/null. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=