Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> Currently, the destiny of amd64 is in the hands of the release manager
> and FTP masters, but that's not in their "duties" to add it. However,
> should the GR pass, I hope the DPL would have the honesty to remove the
> delegates who would fail to comply with it.
The GR in question is inappropriate. It speaks about sarge. For me,
the issue about sarge is settled: nothing should be in sarge unless it
succeeds in sid and testing.
Now there is a *different* question: should the current amd64 be in
sid? I can see no reason why not, but then, I wonder why you all
didn't get it in sid *long* ago. We put hurd-i386 in sid almost from
the very first day.
Thomas
Reply to: