Re: Description of tasks
Hiya Debian,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:28:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:03:23PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le ven, 16/07/2004 à 13:51 +0100, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> >> > * Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2004.bluespice.org> [2004-07-16 14:42]:
> >> > > I won't document wanna-build/buildd/sbuild, because I'm not a buildd
> >> > > admin
> >> > You won't or you cannot?
> >> > Anyway, I think it is pretty obvious by now to anyone following this
> >> > list that you're not really interested in contributing.
> >> Oh, sure. Setting up buildd.net was not a contribution. That's probably
> >> why I have to go there several times a week to find out information
> >> that's not on buildd.debian.org.
> > What sort of information is on buildd.net and not on buildd.debian.org?
> The way the information is presented is different and the graphs are
> unique (i.e. a brief history of the data from buildd.d.o).
Yes it splits out the graphs which is possibly useful. Nothing that
can't be generated from the /stats/ bits of buildd.debian.org though
right?
It also seems to have grown some arbitrary voting script. Nice. Is it
going to have full slashdot news soon?
> You can't see what the "Needs-build" was yesterday on buildd.d.o but
> you can on buildd.net. That often shows problems that aren't aparent
> from buildd.d.o at all.
So fold this stuff into the buildd.d.o code or make www.buildd.net
better in a mature way but don't just cut out architectures for random
reasons.
Simon.
--
[ "Somebody's poisoned the waterhole!" ]
Black Cat Networks. http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
Reply to: