Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:03:41 -0600
Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:55:20AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:23:45PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:01AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:48:36PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > > Direct write access seems quite reasonable, but I've seen a
> > > > > number of messages from d-i package maintainers (and others)
> > > > > on debian-boot saying"your translation has the wrong encoding,
> > > > > I've fixed it". This is why I said elsewhere in this thread
> > > > > that I think direct commit access for translators is
> > > > > reasonable as long as a maintainer, or somebody taking on that
> > > > > role, is responsible for the upload.
> > > >
> > > > And I replied that with Dominique's proposal, someone will have
> > > > to build those l10n packages, so these errors will be caught as
> > > > well.
>
> > > They will definitely not catch all the errors I've caught in the
> > > past. Sorry.
>
> > *This* is laughable.
>
> Why?
because it's just plain arrogance,
grts Tim
Reply to: