[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian IS for the enterprise (Was: Debian Enterprise?)



On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 07:21:44PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>:
> > > but we don't need xMb of Linux Gazette,
> > 
> > Shall we throw out doc-linux-text and doc-linux-html while we're at it?
> 
> <beggingly>Yes please.</beggingly>
> 
> > Isn't it better to have a "Universal Operating System" which can be employed
> > in any number of ways, including a mixed system?
> 
> Yes it is, if it worked. It doesn't.

<flame mode on>
So, you're unhappy with the fact that it takes quite a while for Debian
to come up with a release. You've assumed a reason for that ("there's
too much"), but haven't done any effort to check whether that actually
_is_ the reason[1]. Moreover, in an effort to try to "fix" the problem, you
blatantly show no interest in any of our users except yourself[2] and
suggest to throw out even the most critical parts of _any_ system, the
documentation. Yet, you expect people to agree with you?

Sorry, that's too much asked.
<flame mode off>

If you really think it takes too long for Debian to release, there are
much better ways to work towards a solution than just to throw out more
than half our packages. I suggest you subscribe to
debian-release@lists.debian.org (if you haven't already) and try to be
helpful there; I suppose that'd be a lot better way to make sure Debian
releases more often.

[1] If you have, I haven't seen it.
[2] Calling much of the system "crap" and suggesting to throw out
everything you, personally, would never use is what I would describe as
"caring only about yourself".

-- 
Wouter Verhelst
Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org
Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org
"Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation."
"So is my neck, stop it anyway!"
  -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: