Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:10:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
> > >
> > > Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
> > So, why is the new libvrobis not in testing ? Sure, saying there is no
> > problem and just ignoring the people that have problems is a way of not
> > being bothered, but it doesn't help for much more than pissing your
> > fellow developers.
> sven# modprobe humour
Mmm, sorry i misreacted then, Michael, i hope you accept my apology.
> I think Michael was poking fun at "solution to this kind of solution".
Well, it should have read solution to this kind of problem, naturally.