Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
> >
> > Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
>
> So, why is the new libvrobis not in testing ? Sure, saying there is no
> problem and just ignoring the people that have problems is a way of not
> being bothered, but it doesn't help for much more than pissing your
> fellow developers.
sven# modprobe humour
I think Michael was poking fun at "solution to this kind of solution".
:)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: