On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:20:00AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:13:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >Mike, when did it become appropriate for someone who does absolutely no
> >work on a subproject to start speaking on behalf of it?
> When is it inappropriate to make a simple observation?
Mike, over the past few months you've been taking every opportunity to
deride testing whether in concept or implementation.
> If I've made an error there,
> go ahead and correct it. If not, I don't see your problem.
I don't have the time nor the inclination to correct unfounded and
malicious claims; you're welcome to express your opinion about testing
being a useless failure, and a waste of bandwidth and time to boot,
but unless you're going to start helping fix the problems you encounter
sometime soon, please do so in a blog rather than on the development list.
For reference, the claim you asserted was a ``fantasy idea'' was ``RC bugs
happen on testing [..] but on a less frequent basis [than unstable]'',
which is entirely true, even right now.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpODsqNLtB9_.pgp
Description: PGP signature