>>>>> "be" == Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de> writes:
be> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:38:07PM -0400,
be> andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it wrote:
>> We still have to make the decision whether to integrate DeMuDi
>> into Debian or have DeMuDi live a life of its own
be> Simple Question: what does it mean for Debian? If you want to
be> contribute better MM packages, just du it.
That was Marco's original proposal as I understood it. Anyway, please
note that Marco intended to do this "privately", not with some backing
from the DeMuDi project (and note that here and elsewhere, when I talk
about DeMuDi, I'm talking about the official project funded by EU,
which is a "part" of AGNULA).
I think that it makes sense to contribute packages to Debian as much
as possible. OTOH DeMuDi has some schedules that Debian has not, and
this of course must be dealt with in some way.
be> If you want to imrpove the hardware detection of the
be> installer, just do it.
That's one of the things I'm investigating. I'm also investigatin
pgi. Any experience on the pros and cons of this latter solution are
very appreciated.
Anyway, please note that the objectives that we as a European Project
have are not simply "packaging", but are also "dissemination", which
is a broad term encompassing all sort of PR you can think about. And
of course Debian PR and DeMuDi PR are two completely different beasts.
bye,
andrea
--
Andrea Glorioso andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it
Centro Tempo Reale http://www.centrotemporeale.it/
AGNULA/DeMuDi Technical Manager http://www.[demudi|agnula].org/
"There's no free expression without control on the tools you use"