Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 20:47, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Shaya Potter <spotter@cs.columbia.edu> writes:
>
> > if the installer asks about it, then it's "part of debian". I'd much
> > rather that the installer ignore non-free, people who want it will know
> > how to add it anyways, and keep the rest of the status-quo.
>
> Wait, so you think that non-free is currently a part of Debian?
>
> One more piece of evidence that the status quo is not working.
no, I was quoting people's arguments. what does the a pair of " glyphs
mean to you.
The author of the GR said it could be in the installer with a new place,
like it is now. I said it's better to keep the status quo and not
include it in the installer, if one wants to make it more clear that its
not part of Debian GNU/Linux, but just a service Debian (as in the
project or individual developers) provides to its users.
I think I was clear.
Reply to: