[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Discussion - non-free software removal

John Goerzen wrote:
> in your sources.list.  BTW, you do realize that I maintain non-free packages
> myself, right?

I maintain 50 debian pkgs (with 8 more in the new queue). Five of
these packages are in non-free.

> You still have yet to point out how this actually hurts people.

I am against the proposal. To my thinking, the detriment is significantly
greater than any improvment.

Here's how I think it actually hurts people:

Users can no longer apt-get non-free packages from the debian mirrors
which are already in their sources.list. Each person wanting to use
contrib or non-free would have to manually edit their file. In my
experience, there is a significant reluctance for users to add
non-official repositories to their source.list. 

I also maintain 5 contrib packages. These pkgs could no longer expect
to have their non-free dependencies automatically downloaded from a
Debian mirror.

To my think, this GR takes away significantly while returning, though
some benefit, very little in comparison.

       Kevin Rosenberg        |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
  http://b9.com/debian.html   | : :' :      The  universal
  GPG signed and encrypted    | `. `'      Operating System
     messages accepted.       |   `-    http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: pgpLZPmhqgOvc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: