Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:05:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Unless the Social Contract has changed recently, then I would expect that
> > anyone who "claims to adhere" to it would support the existence of contrib
> > and non-free, since 5 *explicitly* states that we will provide our users
> > with access to this software.
> Which is exactly what John's GR proposes to amend.
Missed this one.
So, when John says the following:
| Nominally, you have accepted the same social contract as everyone else and
| would claim to adhere to Debian's strong Free Software stance. I fail to
| see why you are taking such a pro-proprietary stance within an organization
| such as Debian.
He is talking about his own future, modified version of the Social Contract?
And anyone who doesn't adhere to that is pro-proprietary?
What John seems to be claiming is that Sections 1 and 5 in the current
Social Contract conflict with each other. The people who are arguing with
him see it differently. That doesn't make them pro-proprietary.
Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>