On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:36:10AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > You miss the point. Junior is not a "level". It is a role. If I am a > parent wishing to see what my children see on their accounts, I may very > well want to be part of group "junior". Furthermore, "med" is certainly not > a level. It, too, is a role. Partly. Same way we can have a processor which parses the entries using the "X-Expertise-Level" we can have another one dividing the groups into roles, according to pre-defined ones, based on the user belonging to a group or other issues. The XML format would be a good choice, if I am not mistaken. > I just don't like the level idea at all. The lines are not very clearly > drawn between what is "novice", what is "intermediate", and what is > "advanced" whereas the separation of menu entries into special kinds of > users, each of which is served by a working group within Debian is very > clearly defined. agreed. -- Jesus Climent | Unix System Admin | Helsinki, Finland. http://www.HispaLinux.es/~data/ | data.pandacrew.org ------------------------------------------------------ Please, encrypt mail address to me: GnuPG ID: 86946D69 FP: BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 ------------------------------------------------------ Registered Linux user #66350 Debian 3.0 & Linux 2.4.19 If a man cannot choose, he ceases to be a man. --Minister (A clockwork orange)
Attachment:
pgp05_cbgZIJ0.pgp
Description: PGP signature