Quoting Craig Dickson (firstname.lastname@example.org): > So, since you neglected to supply the version numbers of the faulty > packages, I am unsure whether you're referring to an upload that didn't > make it into Sid today, or to razor 1.20-1. Should we all downgrade to > razor 1.19-1, or is that one okay? (It seems to be working, but you also > didn't tell us what the bad package's symptoms are, so I can't evaluate > this with certainty either.) Sorry, i was referring to 1.20-1 indeed. > I'm glad you take the effort to package these things for us. I use them > and appreciate them. But your problem report is so lacking in > information that it's basically useless. I only package razor, i can't take credit for spamasassin :) Greets, Robert -- ( o> Linux Generation <o ) ///\ finger email@example.com for my GnuPG/PGP key. /\\\ \V_/ \_V/ <doogie> 'How to Raise Your I.Q. by Eating Gifted Children'
Description: PGP signature