[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spamasassin/razor (do not upgrade)

Quoting Craig Dickson (crdic@pacbell.net):
> So, since you neglected to supply the version numbers of the faulty
> packages, I am unsure whether you're referring to an upload that didn't
> make it into Sid today, or to razor 1.20-1. Should we all downgrade to
> razor 1.19-1, or is that one okay? (It seems to be working, but you also
> didn't tell us what the bad package's symptoms are, so I can't evaluate
> this with certainty either.)

Sorry, i was referring to 1.20-1 indeed.

> I'm glad you take the effort to package these things for us. I use them
> and appreciate them. But your problem report is so lacking in
> information that it's basically useless.

I only package razor, i can't take credit for spamasassin :)

( o>                          Linux Generation                          <o )
///\            finger rvdm@debian.org for my GnuPG/PGP key.            /\\\
\V_/                                                                    \_V/
        <doogie> 'How to Raise Your I.Q. by Eating Gifted Children'        

Attachment: pgpvYKGKijtu9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: