On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 12:37:32PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 29/09/01 Michael Bramer wrote: > > IMHO bind should support chroot per mount --bind and if Christian use > > 2.2 and he like chrooded bind, he will post a patch to > > submit@bugs.debian.org. Or not Christian? > > No. If the bind debian package will only support chroot by using mount > --bind, I will not send in a patch. Especially since like previously > stated in this discussion it's fairly easy to chroot bind this days and > I don't see any need for depending on kernel 2.4.x features like 2.4.x > for this purpose. So instead of sending in a patch, I would stop > installing debian on any machine that should be a nameserver and switch What? Sorry Christian but this is your problem... > to an os, where either I get a chrooted bind by default or directly can > build a chroot manually. And you can't 'directly build a chroot manually' on a debian system? Sorry, I don't understand... And maybe you should send a HOWTO and a FAQ to the bind9 package. The maintainer can include this for 2.2 user. > P.S.: I wonder what the hell all you people favoring mount --bind would > do if that option wouldn't be available. Would you then stop chrooting .... And I wonder what the hell you throw away debian. If you have more problemes with debian? (The '--bind problem' is IMHO not a reason to throw away it...) Gruss Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org PGP: finger grisu@db.debian.org -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux ETS: 1:15 -> Estimated Time of Sleep
Attachment:
pgpXUds9K0XEz.pgp
Description: PGP signature