On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:32:11PM -0600, Chad C. Walstrom wrote: > Actually, I would second this. epic, the 3.0x version of the IRC > client, has not been developed for quite some time, IIRC. I would be > for removing epic and adding a "Provides:" line to the epic4 control > file. Changing epic4 to epic and having it provide 'epic4' at > sometime in the future would be a nice closure, but not necessary, > IMHO. This is a bad plan since epic3 is 100% compatible with ircII 2.8.2 scripts and epic4 is not. Our ircII package also is not (4.something) and bitchx as always is its own thing. > Anyone use the 'epic' package and not 'epic4'? Probably not. =) -- Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> Free software developer <zarkov> "NT 5.0. All the bugs and ten times the code size!"
Description: PGP signature