Re: ITA: epic4
"Chad C. Walstrom" <chewie@wookimus.net> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:15:51PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> > epic is sort of 'sentimental' for me, as it was my first Debian
> > package in '97, but I don't even use epic4 anymore, and don't have
> > the time to hack on it (Apache stuff is taking up increasing amounts
> I still use the epic4 client, and I'd REALLY like to roll the
> libreadline into it one of these days. (It would be PERFECT then.
> *grin*) I'd be willing to adopt it from you. I'm currently working
> on fixing up gtimer, my first adopted package, and I'm awaiting DAM
> approval. By the time I wrap up gtimer and get DAM approval, I
> should be able to upload packages w/o a sponsor.
> So, ya willing to give it up to a daily user of epic? ;-) If so, I'll
> submit an ITA to BTS.
Oops, that wasn't entirely clear. I should have written "I don't even
use epic4, *let alone* epic", or something to that effect. Epic is a
different package.
Maybe we should just get rid of it? Does anyone still use it? It's
certainly not actively developed upstream - epic4 is the current
one...
--
David N. Welton
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org
Reply to: