[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Drop 'epic' package? (was incorrectly Re: ITA: epic4)

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:32:11PM -0600, Chad C. Walstrom wrote:

> > Actually, I would second this.  epic, the 3.0x version of the IRC
> > client, has not been developed for quite some time, IIRC.  I would
> > be for removing epic and adding a "Provides:" line to the epic4
> > control file.  Changing epic4 to epic and having it provide
> > 'epic4' at sometime in the future would be a nice closure, but not
> > necessary, IMHO.

> This is a bad plan since epic3 is 100% compatible with ircII 2.8.2
> scripts and epic4 is not.  Our ircII package also is not
> (4.something) and bitchx as always is its own thing.

> > Anyone use the 'epic' package and not 'epic4'?

> Probably not.  =)

Well if no one uses it, why should we keep it?

David N. Welton
     Personal:           http://www.efn.org/~davidw/  
Free Software:           http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
   Apache Tcl:           http://tcl.apache.org

Reply to: