Re: Drop 'epic' package? (was incorrectly Re: ITA: epic4)
Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:32:11PM -0600, Chad C. Walstrom wrote:
> > Actually, I would second this. epic, the 3.0x version of the IRC
> > client, has not been developed for quite some time, IIRC. I would
> > be for removing epic and adding a "Provides:" line to the epic4
> > control file. Changing epic4 to epic and having it provide
> > 'epic4' at sometime in the future would be a nice closure, but not
> > necessary, IMHO.
> This is a bad plan since epic3 is 100% compatible with ircII 2.8.2
> scripts and epic4 is not. Our ircII package also is not
> (4.something) and bitchx as always is its own thing.
> > Anyone use the 'epic' package and not 'epic4'?
> Probably not. =)
Well if no one uses it, why should we keep it?
David N. Welton
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org