[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Drop 'epic' package? (was incorrectly Re: ITA: epic4)



On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:32:53PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Maybe we should just get rid of [epic]?  Does anyone still use it?
> It's certainly not actively developed upstream - epic4 is the
> current one...

Actually, I would second this.  epic, the 3.0x version of the IRC
client, has not been developed for quite some time, IIRC.  I would be
for removing epic and adding a "Provides:" line to the epic4 control
file.  Changing epic4 to epic and having it provide 'epic4' at
sometime in the future would be a nice closure, but not necessary,
IMHO.

Anyone use the 'epic' package and not 'epic4'?

-- 
Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net>                 | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net/                            | s.k.a. gunnarr
Key fingerprint = B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31  1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD

Attachment: pgpr15ZT8mGHm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: