On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:32:53PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote: > Maybe we should just get rid of [epic]? Does anyone still use it? > It's certainly not actively developed upstream - epic4 is the > current one... Actually, I would second this. epic, the 3.0x version of the IRC client, has not been developed for quite some time, IIRC. I would be for removing epic and adding a "Provides:" line to the epic4 control file. Changing epic4 to epic and having it provide 'epic4' at sometime in the future would be a nice closure, but not necessary, IMHO. Anyone use the 'epic' package and not 'epic4'? -- Chad Walstrom <chewie@wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Key fingerprint = B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31 1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD
Attachment:
pgpJv8TVw7DoG.pgp
Description: PGP signature