[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian FreeBSD

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:

> > I suspect John was talking about the second (he's speaking about /a/ nasty
> > BSD license, not /the/ nasty BSD license).
> > 
> > Many people prefer BSD-sans-ad-clause to the old BSD license.
> Based on my thousands of arguments with John on this very subject many
> many times over, I would say that his problem with the BSD is the former
> as he also considers the X license to be "nasty" because it can be
> exploited.

Precisely.  While I am no big fan of the advertising clause, I view it 
as far less insidious than the vulnerability to being adopted and made 

John Goerzen   Linux, Unix consulting & programming   jgoerzen@complete.org |
Developer, Debian GNU/Linux (Free powerful OS upgrade)       www.debian.org |
The 176,587th digit of pi is 2.

Reply to: