[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian FreeBSD



On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 08:33:38 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> The same as for using FreeBSD itself: it's got a nasty BSD license.

On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 09:44:48 -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> Bah, last I checked, BSD was DFSG-free...
> Not everyone likes the GPL.

On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 09:45:23 -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> And thus spake John Goerzen, on Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 08:33:38AM -0500:
> > The same as for using FreeBSD itself: it's got a nasty BSD license.
> 
> Er, the BSD license is still DFSG free, last I checked.

Just about all objections against BSD licenses fall in two categories:
1) It can be assimilated
2) It has the nasty advertisement clause. See
   http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html

I suspect John was talking about the second (he's speaking about /a/ nasty
BSD license, not /the/ nasty BSD license).

Many people prefer BSD-sans-ad-clause to the old BSD license.

Ray
-- 
Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.


Reply to: