On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 10:22:56PM -0600, email@example.com wrote: > Navindra Umanee writes: > > I'm sorry, yes I think I did screw up completely here. Would you mind > > re-explaining what is wrong with linking a GPL'ed program against a QPL > > library again? > > Please look this up in the archives. It was discussed extensively > recently. > > > QPL allows you to write a GPL program linked against it, so what is the > > GPL'ed program's problem with the QPL library? > > So if Microsoft added a clause to the MFC license saying that it was ok to > link GPL programs to it then it would be ok? The MFC is part of the major components of the OS--the compiler in this case. It's the equivalent of libc for windoze, you can technically write code without it but. -- Show me the code or get out of my way.
Description: PGP signature