[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)

On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 10:22:56PM -0600, john@dhh.gt.org wrote:
> Navindra Umanee writes:
> > I'm sorry, yes I think I did screw up completely here.  Would you mind
> > re-explaining what is wrong with linking a GPL'ed program against a QPL
> > library again?
> Please look this up in the archives.  It was discussed extensively
> recently.
> > QPL allows you to write a GPL program linked against it, so what is the
> > GPL'ed program's problem with the QPL library?
> So if Microsoft added a clause to the MFC license saying that it was ok to
> link GPL programs to it then it would be ok?

The MFC is part of the major components of the OS--the compiler in this
case.  It's the equivalent of libc for windoze, you can technically write
code without it but.

Show me the code or get out of my way.

Attachment: pgp8i2GkfwW4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: