Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 03:19:00 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19981121031900.D19637@yodeller.rising.com.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19981120033808.06388@cs.mcgill.ca>; from Navindra Umanee on Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 03:38:08AM -0500
References: <[🔎] 19981120033808.06388@cs.mcgill.ca>

On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 03:38:08AM -0500, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> Why?  Doesn't Qt deserve Motif-like status as a system library?  Motif

We don't have any such magic libraries to date. We don't have a standard
Motif system library, either. 


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD              hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
  - From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>

References:
- Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
  - From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Things left to do for release.
Next by Date: Re: Qt and other
Previous by thread: Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Next by thread: Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread