Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Navindra Umanee writes:
> I'm sorry, yes I think I did screw up completely here. Would you mind
> re-explaining what is wrong with linking a GPL'ed program against a QPL
> library again?
Please look this up in the archives. It was discussed extensively
recently.
> QPL allows you to write a GPL program linked against it, so what is the
> GPL'ed program's problem with the QPL library?
So if Microsoft added a clause to the MFC license saying that it was ok to
link GPL programs to it then it would be ok?
--
John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
john@dhh.gt.org Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
Reply to: