Re: QT non-free but becoming compatible to debian? (was Re: Qt license change)
Montreal Fri Nov 20 15:20:47 1998
Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 03:38:08AM -0500, Navindra Umanee wrote:
> > Why? Doesn't Qt deserve Motif-like status as a system library? Motif
> We don't have any such magic libraries to date. We don't have a standard
> Motif system library, either.
Exactly, which is why there is a void to be filled, IHHO. In this day
and time we need GUI APIs that developers can target. Qt and GTK+
both qualify and both have their points.
Btw, I clearly see mozilla-smotif in:
So might you be wrong about the Motif thing?