Re: RH and GNOME

To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Cc: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RH and GNOME
From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 02:18:22 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 35B432AE.37089BC8@livenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 35B41D87.1F7A0B23@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980721005650.46386@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 35B42292.D356570A@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980720230440.B18423@kitenet.net>

Well, the rpms I have seen place their contents in
/usr/local/enlightenment.  So.....

As to the anti RH sentiment.  I am not truly anti-RH.  However it
appears that RH is positioning itself to control key parts of the Linux
market.  The recent X-server announcement.  The bru-ha-ha over GNOME.  A
few comments made at Linux Expo and elsewhere.  It just looks, well
troublesome.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: fog@irfmn.mnegri.it

References:
- RH and GNOME
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Next by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Previous by thread: Re: RH and GNOME
Next by thread: Re: RH and GNOME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread