Re: RH and GNOME

To: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>, Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: Re: RH and GNOME
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 02:28:53 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980721022853.51064@test.legislate.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 35B432AE.37089BC8@livenet.net>; from Shaleh on Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 02:18:22AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 35B41D87.1F7A0B23@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980721005650.46386@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] 35B42292.D356570A@livenet.net> <[🔎] 19980720230440.B18423@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 35B432AE.37089BC8@livenet.net>

Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net> wrote:
> As to the anti RH sentiment. I am not truly anti-RH. However it
> appears that RH is positioning itself to control key parts of the
> Linux market. The recent X-server announcement. The bru-ha-ha over
> GNOME. A few comments made at Linux Expo and elsewhere. It just looks,
> well troublesome.

I don't see why this should be troublesome.

I'm far more troubled by the state of dpkg.

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- RH and GNOME
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: RH and GNOME
  - From: Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Next by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Previous by thread: Re: RH and GNOME
Next by thread: Re: RH and GNOME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread