Re: RH and GNOME
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 02:18:22AM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> Well, the rpms I have seen place their contents in
> /usr/local/enlightenment. So.....
>
> As to the anti RH sentiment. I am not truly anti-RH. However it
> appears that RH is positioning itself to control key parts of the Linux
> market. The recent X-server announcement. The bru-ha-ha over GNOME. A
> few comments made at Linux Expo and elsewhere. It just looks, well
> troublesome.
And don't forget the f r e s h m e a t Alan Cox's editorial, where
he says that LSB needs a standard package format (why?) and that
format can be RPM... (is LSB going to be a subset of RH?)
Ciao,
--***********************************************************************
* Federico DI Gregorio ** GCS/S/>L d- s:>:+ a26 C++ UL++ P+++ L*+++>$ D *
* <fog@debian.org> ** W+>++ N+ o? !K w--->!$ O M- V-- PS+(+++) PE(--)
* Debian Developer ** Y+(-)(+)(-)... PGP+ s+ 5- X+++ R*<+(+++) b+++ *
* ** DI++ D---- G- e+++>++++ h--- r++ z++ *
*************************************************************************
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: