Re: Strang shutdown mechanism with Debian
>>>>> "Miquel" == Miquel van Smoorenburg <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Miquel> Yes we do. And I'm not going to explain this all *again*.
Explain to me in words of one sylable how the range 00-99 suddenly
became the range 91-99
Miquel> Nope. You clearly do not understand the mechanism at all.
No, I haven't got the first clue. I've only been using the exact same
mechanism for over siz years on multiple Unices. :)
>> The only time particular scripts should care about their
>> position within a K* *or* S* sequence is when they require the
>> services set-up/shut-down by another script.
Miquel> Yes. And for the scripts I am talking about this is very
Miquel> Which is what I did if you had bothered to read the rest
Miquel> of the thread.
Then where in the thread (which I did read) did you mention removing
the throughly broken (IMNSHO) use S?? as a shut-down mechaism?
all coders are created equal; that they are endowed with certain
unalienable rights, of these are beer, net connectivity, and the
pursuit of bugfixes... - Gregory R Block
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org