debian-ctte Dec 2020 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Josh Triplett
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Mark Hindley
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Simon McVittie
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Philip Hands
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Simon McVittie
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Mark Hindley
Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
lorenzo
Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Philip Hands
Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
lorenzo
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Matthew Vernon
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Philip Hands
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Mark Hindley
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Vincent Bernat
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sam Hartman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Matthew Vernon
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sam Hartman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sam Hartman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Wouter Verhelst
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
gregor herrmann
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Russ Allbery
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Bdale Garbee
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sam Hartman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Vincent Bernat
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Russ Allbery
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sam Hartman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Ansgar
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Elana Hashman
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Matthew Vernon
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Mark Hindley
Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?
Ian Jackson
Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not?
Niels Thykier
Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not?
Sean Whitton
Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation
Sean Whitton
Message not available
Processed: Re: Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation
Debian Bug Tracking System
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation
Andreas Metzler
Next Meeting - December 16th at 18:00 UTC (in 1.5 hours)
Margarita Manterola
Additional TC meeting before next one
Margarita Manterola
Re: Additional TC meeting before next one
Margarita Manterola
Processed: retitle 975075 to Should NetworkManager support elogind?
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: retitle 975075 to tech-ctte: Should NetworkManager support elogind?
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?
Ansgar
Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?
Marco d'Itri
Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?
Matthias Klumpp
The last update was on 17:00 GMT Tue Dec 29. There are 49 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc