Aw: Re: Creating a new named official debian repository for OpenStack backports (Uploading all of OpenStack to backports)
Hello,
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. März 2014 um 09:28 Uhr
> Von: "Lucas Nussbaum" <lucas@debian.org>
> An: "Thomas Goirand" <zigo@debian.org>
> Cc: debian-backports@lists.debian.org, "FTP Master" <ftpmaster@debian.org>
> Betreff: Re: Creating a new named official debian repository for OpenStack backports (Uploading all of OpenStack to backports)
>
> On 11/03/14 at 13:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Second, there's only a single "wheezy-backports". Therefore, I can't
> > have OpenStack Grizzly, Havana and Icehouse hosted at the same time by
> > Debian. Same issue in Sid/Testing by the way. This is a huge problems
> > for integrators/users, because they should be the one deciding when to
> > upgrade their cloud IaaS. If I decide to override Havana by Icehouse
> > (for example), then I can't provide security updates for Havana anymore
> > in Debian.
>
> Have you considered solving this using the way we usually allow several
> versions of the same software in Debian, that is, by suffixing the
> package name with the version? (gcc4.7, gcc4.8)
> I'm not completely convinced that we need several versions of OpenStack
> at the same time in a backports-like repository, but if you want to
> achieve that, that's a way that doesn't involve separate repositories
> for each release.
If we had a Debian PPA already, then this is how we would use it, right?
Steffen
Reply to: