Re: Ruby Package Backports

[Manuel Holtgrewe <purestorm@ggnore.net>]

Am 14.01.2007 um 23:13 schrieb Daniel Baumann:

> Manuel Holtgrewe wrote:
> > >   * librmagick-ruby
> > >
> > >     doesn't build, needs lowered cdbs build-depends (you had that
> > >     already in the previous package, but you have oviously  
> > > removed it
> > >     for some reason).
> >
> > I did not realize that the debian/control is overwritten by something
> > automatically generated from debian/control.in. The package should be
> > fixed now.
>
> i'm sorry to say, but you should also lower the libmagick build- 
> depends
> to match the package in sarge. the libmagick backport is not required.

Do you have a script that determines this that I could use to check  
this kind of things or do you look this up manually?

I changed the build dependency to libmagick6-dev, the same one as in  
stable.

--
I have found an elegant and short solution for Fermat's Theorem
but sadly there is not enough space for it in this signature.