Re: Ruby Package Backports
Am 14.01.2007 um 23:13 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
Manuel Holtgrewe wrote:
doesn't build, needs lowered cdbs build-depends (you had that
already in the previous package, but you have oviously
for some reason).
I did not realize that the debian/control is overwritten by something
automatically generated from debian/control.in. The package should be
i'm sorry to say, but you should also lower the libmagick build-
to match the package in sarge. the libmagick backport is not required.
Do you have a script that determines this that I could use to check
this kind of things or do you look this up manually?
I changed the build dependency to libmagick6-dev, the same one as in
I have found an elegant and short solution for Fermat's Theorem
but sadly there is not enough space for it in this signature.